Vivisection and whether it should be morally accepted for the benefits of human beings

Other animals do none of these things. Since animals can experience pain and suffering, they have an interest in avoiding pain. Maceration grinding into small pieces is used on 1 day old chicks. Not only is this reply more than a little disingenuous, since the greatest impediment to developing new scientifically valid non animal alternatives, and to using those that already exist, is the hold that the ideology of vivisection currently has on medical researchers and those who fund them.

The test of the justifiability of research with non-human primates is therefore whether or not the research is justifiable when the costs to the non-human primates are set against the benefits to humans; informed consent is simply not the relevant issue.

Presently, animal rights advocates are not calling for more humane welfare standards or laws; but for animal experimentation to be abolished.

Rather, they are identical with their souls, or the immaterial, mental substance that constitutes their consciousness. Also, I cannot go to the town square and destroy an old tree for fun since this may upset many people that care for the tree. This sort of reasoning has been used to justify such practices as experimentation that uses animals, raising animals for food, and using animals for our entertainment in such places as rodeos and zoos.

Ameba and paramecia are not vegetables or minerals; they are animals. All savages are cruel, and it is not their customs that tend in this direction; their cruelty is the result of their food.

Cambridge University Press, Sadism or research; that is the question?

Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective

Humans generally, and almost universally, accord a lower priority to all animals than they accord to any humans which means, inter alia, that they believe it right to save humans before animals.

The University of Illinois Press, This statement appears early in that section: Our duties to those without rights can be trumped by considerations of the overall good. Here is the main problem with the discussion of ethics in the Weatherall Report: Another way to escape this line of argument is to deny the second premise Cf.

When rights conflict Sometimes a particular situation results in a conflict of rights. In other words, a being with inherent value has rights, and these rights act as trumps against the promotion of the overall good. Drug B killed all the dogs and rats.

Drug C killed all the mice and rats. For example, on the above conception of rights, whether a being will have a right or not will depend on whether it is able to represent itself as a being that is legitimately pursuing the furtherance of its interests.

These duties extend not simply to the duty to refrain from harming the property of others and the duty to not offend animal lovers. All non-human animal species lack the capacity for free moral judgment.

Where dissimilar harms are involved, avoid harming the worse-off individual. Likewise, the senile may have a direct moral status due to the desires they had when they were younger and rational.Being the most intelligent beings on the planet, it is entirely normal to want to explore your sexuality.

Although in the end, an animal is not a person and does not have the ability to comprehend what you are doing, what you do with what they have might be the same as if the animal was a human. Should Animals Be Used for Scientific or Commercial Testing?

Read pros, cons, and expert responses in the debate. Many experiments inflict severe pain without the remotest prospect of significant benefits for human beings or any other animals. "I believe I am not interested to know whether Vivisection produces results that are. Animal rights is the idea in which some, or all, non-human animals are entitled to the possession of their own lives and that their most basic interests—such as the need to avoid suffering—should be afforded the same consideration as similar interests of human beings.

Animal Experimentation: The Truth An Animal Rights Article from FROM. M. Butterflies Katz, March Leonardo Da Vinci, the ingenious artist, scientist and inventor said "One day the world will look upon research upon animals as it now looks upon research on human beings.".

Research topic: Vivisection and whether it should be morally accepted for the benefits of human beings. This report attempts to prove that vivisection should be morally accepted by the society.

In essence, the report touches on the importance of vivisection in medicine and other non-medicine products too.

Animal rights

However, there are some properties which only human beings have which have seemed to many to be able to ground a full and equal moral status; for example, being rational, autonomous, or able to act morally have all been used to justify giving a stronger status to human beings than we do to animals.

Vivisection and whether it should be morally accepted for the benefits of human beings
Rated 0/5 based on 67 review